Tadqiqot


PhET: Tadqiqot va Ishlanma:
PhET simulyatsiyalari qanday ishlab chiqilganligi va o'rganishni eng yaxshi targ'ib qilish uchun simulyatsiyalarni takomillashtirish bo'yicha tadqiqot jarayoni.



PhET quyidagilarni yaxshiroq tushunish uchun dizayn va interfaol simulyatsiyalardan foydalanish boʻyicha tadqiqot olib boradi:
  1. Qaysi xususiyatlar ushbu vositalarni o'rganishni samarali qiladi va nima uchun
  2. O‘quvchilar o'rganish uchun ushbu vositalar bilan qanday shug‘ullanishadi, ular bilan qanday munosabatda bo‘lishadi va bu jarayonga nima taʼsir qiladi
  3. Qachon, qanday va nima uchun bu vositalar turli o'quv muhitlarida samarali bo'ladi
PhET simulyatsiyasini loyihalash tamoyillari o‘quvchilarning qanday oʻrganishi haqidagi tadqiqotlarga (Bransford va boshq., 2000) va simulyatsiya intervyulariga asoslanadi (qarang: PhET Dizayn Jarayoni). Har bir simulyatsiya bilan to‘rtdan oltitagacha individual talabalar bilan ovoz chiqarib o‘ylash uslubidagi suhbatlar o'tkaziladi. Ushbu intervyular interfeys dizaynini va o‘quvchilarni o‘rganishini o‘rganish uchun boy maʼlumotlar manbasini taqdim etadi. PhET Qarash va Tushunish interfeysi dizayn tamoyillarimizni qisqacha tavsiflaydi va toʻliq muhokama Adams va boshq., 2008 tomonidan chop etilgan juft maqolada keltirilgan.

Tez-tez beriladigan savollarga tadqiqot javoblari:

"PhET simulyatsiyalari haqiqiy laboratoriya jihozlari o‘rnini bosa oladimi?"
Bizning tadqiqotlarimiz PhET simulyatsiyalarining kontseptual tushunish uchun samaraliroq ekanligini ko‘rsatdi; ammo, simulyatsiyalar hal qilmaydigan amaliy laboratoriyalarning ko‘plab maqsadlari mavjud. Masalan, uskunaning ishlashi bilan bog‘liq maxsus ko‘nikmalar. Laboratoriyangizning maqsadlariga qarab, oddiy simulyatsiyalar yoki simulyatsiyalar kombinatsiyasi va haqiqiy jihozlardan foydalanish samaraliroq bo‘lishi mumkin.

"Uyga borib, simulyatsiya bilan ishlashni aytsam, o‘quvchilar o'rganishadimi?"
Aksariyat o‘quvchilar, agar bahosi kabito‘g‘ridan-to‘g‘ri motivatsiya bo‘lmasa, o‘z vaqtida fan simulyatsiyasi(ular qiziqarli, lekin unchalik emas) bilan ishlashga vaqt o‘tkazish uchun kerakli harakatga ega emas. Bu biz simulyatsiyalarni uy vazifasiga qanday qilib eng yaxshi integratsiya qilish loyihasini amalga oshirishimiz sabablaridan biridir.

"Mening kursimda PhET simulyatsiyalaridan foydalanish uchun eng yaxshi joy qayerda?"
Biz PhET simulyatsiyalarini maʼruza, dars mashg‘ulotlari, laboratoriya va uy vazifalarini bajarishda juda samarali ekanligini aniqladik. Ular darsning har bir jihatiga osongina birlashtirilishi uchun minimal matn bilan yaratilgan.

Bizning qiziqishlarimiz:

Tushunish uchun analogiyadan foydalanish: Talabalar notanish hodisalarni tushunish uchun simulyatsiyalarda analogiyalardan foydalanadilar. O‘quvchilar tomonidan analogiyadan foydalanishda tasvirlar asosiy rol o‘ynaydi.

Simulyatsiyalar sinf meʼyorlarini o‘zgartirish vositasi sifatida: Simulyatsiyalar fanning ijtimoiy-madaniy meʼyorlari asosida shakllantiriladi, bundan tashqari ulardan o‘quvchilarning sinfda ishtirok etishining anʼanaviy me'yorlarini o‘zgartirish uchun ham foydalanish mumkin.

Oʻrganish va faol izlanishga yordam beruvchi simulyatsiyalarning oʻziga xos xususiyatlari: Bizning dizayn tamoyillarimiz simulyatsiyalarning asosiy xususiyatlarini aniqlaydi, bu esa ularni talabalarni jalb qilish uchun samarali vosita qiladi. Endi biz har bir xususiyat talaba tushunchasiga qanday taʼsir qilishini batafsil o‘rganmoqchimiz.

Simulyatsiyalarni uy vazifasiga integratsiyalash: Simulyatsiyalar koʻpchilik oʻquv vositalarida mavjud boʻlmagan oʻziga xos xususiyatlar(interaktivlik, animatsiya, dinamik fikr-mulohazalar, samarali izlanish imkonini beradi)ga ega

Kimyo simulyatsiyalarining samaradorligi: Biz kimyo simulyatsiyalari qayerda va qanday qilib samarali o'rganish vositalari bo'lishi mumkinligini tekshirishni boshladik.

Nashrlar va Taqdimotlar

Samarali simulyatsiya dizayni uchun muhim xususiyatlar (asosan intervyu ma'lumotlari)

Sinfda foydalanish haqida tadqiqotlar

PhET simulyatsiyalari Haqida

O‘quvchilarning O‘rganish Haqidagi Tasavvurlari

PhET Tadqiqotchilarining Boshqa Ishlari

Boshqa tadqiqotchilar tomonidan PhET simulyatsiyasi bo‘yicha nashrlar

  • Constructionism and microworlds as part of a 21st century learning activity to impact student engagement and confidence in physics, Wickham, C. M., Girvan, C., & Tangney, B., (2016, Feb). Sipitakiat, A., & Tutiyaphuengprasert, N. (Eds.) Proceedings of Constructionism 2016. Paper presented at Constructionism 2016, Bangkok Thailand (34-41).
  • Use of physics simulations in whole class and small group settings: Comparative case studies, A.L. Stephens & J.J. Clement , Computers & Education 86, 137-156, 2015.
  • Balancing Act: Do Preservice Teachers in an Integrated Mathematics/Science Course Categorize a Levers Problem as Mathematics or Science?, P. Cormas, Annual meeting of the Association for Science Teacher Education (ASTE), San Antonio, January, 2014.
  • Investigating the Relationship Between the Substance Metaphor for Energy and Its Proposed Affordances and Limitations, L. M. Goodhew and A. D. Robertson, in preparation for 2014 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, edited by P. V. Englehardt, A. D. Churukian, and D. L. Jones (AIP, Minneapolis, MN), 2014.
  • Not a magic bullet: the effect of scaffolding on knowledge and attitudes in online simulations, Roll, I., Briseno, A., Yee, N., & Welsh, A., In J. Polman, E. Kyza, I. Tabak, & K. O’Neill, proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences. (30%), 2014.
  • Students’ adaptation and transfer of strategies across levels of scaffolding in an exploratory environment, Roll, I., Yee, N., Briseno, A, In proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Honolulu, HI, 2014.
  • The impact of computer simulations as interactive demonstration tools on the performance of Grade 11 learners in electromagnetis, Kotoka J and Kriek J., African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 18(1), 2014.
  • Animation or Simulation: Investigating the Importance of Interactivity for Learning Solubility Equilibria, Akaygun, S. & Jones, L. L., In J. P. Suits & M. J. Sanger, (Eds.) Pedagogic Roles of Animations and Simulations in Chemistry Courses, (pp. 127-159), Washington, DC: Oxford University Press, 2014.
  • How Does Level of Guidance Affect Understanding When Students Use a Dynamic Simulation of Liquid-Vapor Equilibrium?, Akaygun, S. & Jones, L. L., In I. Devetak, & S. A. Glazar, (Eds), Learning with understanding in the chemistry classroom, (pp. 243-263), Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2014.
  • Multimodal study of visual problem solving in chemistry with multiple representations, S. Hansen, Dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, 2014.
  • Designing online scaffolds for interactive computer simulation, Chen, C.-H., Wu, I.-C., & Jen, F.-L, Interactive Learning Environments, 21(3), 229–243, 2013.
  • Computer simulations and clear observations do not guarantee conceptual understanding, Renken, M. D., & Nunez, N., Learning and Instruction, 23, 10–23, 2013.
  • Applying cognitive developmental psychology to middle school physics learning: The rule assessment method, Hallinen, N. R., Chi, M., Chin, D. B., Prempeh, J., Blair, K. P., & Schwartz, D. L., 1513, 158–161, 2013.
  • “Re-Simulating”: Physics Simulations for Blind Students, Bulbul, M. S., Demirtas, D., Garip, B., & Oktay, O., Presented at the New Perspectives in Science Education., 2013.
  • Electromagnetic Induction, Yochum, H., et.al., Science & Children. 51(2):63-67, 2013.
  • Teacher candidates' knowledge construction with technology, Zhou, G., & Xu, Z., Knowledge construction and multimodal curriculum development (pp.112-127). IGI Global, 2013.
  • Enhancing Students’ Scientific Literacy In Science Education Using Interactive Simulations: A Critical Literature Review, Fan, X. & Geelan, D.R., Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 32(2), 125-171, 2013.
  • Radiation and Atomic Literacy for Nonscientists, Johnson, A, Science 342(6157): 436-437, 2013.
  • Students’ Conceptual Change in Electricity and Magnetism using Simulations: a Comparison of Cognitive Perturbation and Cognitive Conflict, Dega, BG, Kriek J & Mogese, TF, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50(6)pp.677-698, 2013.
  • Teacher education using computer simulations—pre and in-service primary school teacher training to teach science, Pinto, A., Barbot, A., Viegas, C., Silva, A. A., Santos, C. A., & Lopes, J. B., Learning Science in the Society of Computers, 28–36., 2012.
  • Designing a Web-Based Science Learning Environment for Model-Based Collaborative Inquiry, Sun, D., & Looi, C.-K., Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2012.
  • The learning effects of computer simulations in science education, Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T., Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153, 2012.
  • Adding value to physics education technology simulations. , Kruhlak, R. J., Vanholsbeeck, F., & Coghill, C., 2012.
  • Inquiry-based Lessons and PhET Simulations - A Great Match for Middle School Classrooms, Zimmer, E., Presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012: AACE, Chesapeake, VA., 2012.
  • Effectiveness of Computer Simulations in Physics Teaching/Learning, Aklilu, T., LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH &Co. KG and licensors, 2012.
  • Effects of Computer Simulations on Undergraduate Science Students Physics Achievement, Aklilu, T., Bereket, G., Melak, M., & Tefaye, G., A stand-alone paper virtually presented at the 2012 Annual international Conference of NARST held on March 25-28/2012 at Indianapolis, Indian, USA, 2012.
  • Integrating Information Technology and Science Education for the Future: A Theoretical Review on the Educational Use of Interactive Simulations, Xinxin Fan & David Geelan, in Proceedings of the 2012 Australian Computers in Education Conference: It's time, Australian Council for Computers in Education, Australia, 2012.
  • Effectiveness of Scientific Visualizations in Year 11 Chemistry and Physics Education, David Geelan, in Proceedings of the 2012 Australian Computers in Education Conference: It's time, Australian Council for Computers in Education, Australia, 2012.
  • The usefulness of log based clustering in a complex simulation environment, Kardan, S., Roll, I., & Conati, C. (to appear), In S. Trausen-Matu & K. Boyer, proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 2012.
  • Identifying & Resolving Problematic Student Thinking About Ionizing Radiation, Maidl, R., et al., National Conference on Undergraduate Research, Weber State College, Ogden, UT, UNC Asheville, 2012.
  • Learning Science Through Computer Games and Simulations., Committee on Science Learning Computer Games, S. A. E., Education, B. O. S., Education, D. O. B. A. S. S. A., National Research Council, National Academies Press, 2011.
  • Science modelling in pre-calculus: how to make mathematics problems contextually meaningful. , Sokolowski, A., Yalvac, B., & Loving, C., International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(3), 283–297, 2011.
  • Discussion-based strategies for use of simulations and animations in middle and high school science classrooms, Leibovitch, A., Stephens, L., Price, N., & Clement, J., Proceedings 
of
 the 
NARST
 2011
 Annual 
Meeting, 2011.
  • Effectiveness of Computer Simulations in the Teaching/ Learning of Physics, Aklilu, T., Tilahun T., and Mesfin T., A stand-alone paper presented at the 2011 Annual international Conference of NARST held on April 3-6/2011 Orlando, Florida, USA, 2011.
  • The use of Interactive Computer Simulations with regard to access to Education – a social justice issue, Kaheru, SJM, Mpeta M and Kriek J, Journal of Educational Studies 10(2) pp 89 - 106, 2011.
  • The activity of simulations to the practical work of foundation physics students at the University of Limpopo, Mhlongo, R, Kriek, J and Basson I, Multicultural education and technology journal. 5(4) p 288-302, 2011.
  • In-service science teachers’ views about learning physics after a one week workshop, Ramlo, S. & Nicholas, J., Human Subjectivity, 1, pp 109-120, 2010.
  • Teachers’ beliefs and their intention to use interactive simulations in their classrooms, Kriek, J. and Stols, G., South African Journal of Education 30 pp. 439 - 456, 2010.
  • Spatial Learning and Computer Simulations in Science, Lindgren, R., & Schwartz, D. L., International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 419–438, 2009.
  • Student perspectives on learning physics and their relationship with learning force and motion concepts: A study using Q methodology, Ramlo, S., Human Subjectivity, 2, pp 73-90, 2008.
  • Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Berbasis Inkuiri Melalui Media Virtual PhET Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Pemanasan Global, K. Rohmah, Rachmadiarti F. & Setiawan B., Universitas Negeri Surabaya (Indonesian).
  • Kerja laboratorium Melalui Phet untuk meremediasi miskonsepsi siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Sungai Raya pada materi Hukum Archimedes, Diar Dwi Winarto, Tanjungpura University (Indonesian).
  • Scientific Inquiry in Mathematics: A Case of Implementing Scientific Simulations for Analyzing Problems on Motion., Sokolowski, A..
  • Teachers using interactive simulations to scaffold inquiry instruction in physical science education, Geelan, D.R. & Fan, X., In J. Gilbert and B. Eilam (Eds.) Science Teachers' Use of Visual Representations. Dordrecht: Springer..
  • Action Research Paper for Master's in Interdisciplinary Studies at University of Northern Colorado: The Effect of Computer Simulations on Learning High School Physics, K. Bibbey.
  • Impact of Electronic Simulations on students’ learning in Lebanese 10th Grade Electricity Courses. (Ph.d research), F. Yehya.
  • Evaluating a Novel Instructional Sequence for Conceptual Development in Physics Using Interactive Simulations, Fan, X., Geelan, D. & Gillies, R., Submitted to the International Journal of Science Education, Under Review.